Responses: 2380
Respondents: 305
The board was originally set up as a non-profit and didn't have a financial duty to investors
👍 85%👎 7%🤷 8%
I don't know what all the fuss is about
👍 8%👎 77%🤷 15%
That Altman could so easily jump ship and begin work suggests the board was in a poor negotiating position
👍 76%👎 8%🤷 16%
The board should have explained themselves clearly within a day
👍 73%👎 9%🤷 19%
I work at an AI firm
👍 16%👎 72%🤷 12%
I read "not consistently candid" as saying Altman lied/misled the board and behaved seriously impropery
👍 71%👎 14%🤷 14%
I consider myself concerned about AI safety
👍 71%👎 19%🤷 11%
AI can become more powerful than humanity
👍 70%👎 14%🤷 16%
I feel notable resentment towards those who push for AI safety
👍 18%👎 67%🤷 14%
Test
👍 62%👎 15%🤷 23%
I am frustrated because OpenAi was cool and now it might die
👍 57%👎 19%🤷 24%
I feel notable resentment towards those who push for AI acceleration
👍 20%👎 56%🤷 24%
The extinction risk from AI is > than 5%
👍 56%👎 34%🤷 11%
AI progress should move more slowly that it is at present
👍 20%👎 55%🤷 25%
GPT 5 had a >1% chance of huge damage (>1 $Trillion)
👍 31%👎 53%🤷 17%
The OpenAI board acted badly
👍 47%👎 0%🤷 53%
The board should have talked to large investors before firing the CEO
👍 46%👎 27%🤷 27%
Sam Altman's team will release a better model than GPT4 within a year.
👍 43%👎 17%🤷 40%
I consider myself an accelerationist
👍 39%👎 41%🤷 20%
AI progress should move more quickly than it is at present
👍 40%👎 31%🤷 29%