13 people have given 104 responses
We don't know how to control machine learning.
We should have been paying people to get an education all along.
A polling system (like this) could be used in theory to align AI.
Crypto credentials will replace money.
Our children should be able to earn a living by educating themselves in ways society desires.
We should not relinquish the job of 'deciding what the AI ought do' to AI.
It's very important that the AI is able to distinguish what IP can from which user.
AI is going to take all the jobs if we let it.
A polling system like this could be implemented into social media to scale a project like CYC.
Determining the beliefs of 8 billion free individuals is required to build an AI that's aligned to all of them.
If it asks enough T/F questions, an AI can find out anything about your beliefs.
All historical advancement is collective, and so asking "can CI solve alignment" is the same as asking "can we solve alignment".
The truth can be approximated by a series of proposition evaluations.
Verification and education are two sides of the same coin.
Creating a truth economy (an economy where the majority of value comes from the verification of truth) is critical to the survival of the humanity.
If Doug Lenat's work would have scaled, Eliezer Yudkowsky would not have existential concerns about it.