72 people have given 454 responses
Statements with the highest number of 👍 or the highest number of 👎 appear at the top (if everyone thinks 👎, that's consensus too)
It is good that organisations take risks even if some bad outcomes happen, but the risks nonlinear took were not worth it
I wouldn't advise a new graduate to work at some rationalist orgs even though they are not bad orgs, but being the kind of org I would advise new grads to avoid is weak evidence that the org is bad
I wouldn't advise a new graduate to work at some rationalist orgs even though they are not bad orgs
It is good that organisations take risks, even if some bad outcomes happen
People expect us to be tracking who is good and bad in our community
If accused, people should have more than several days to respond to allegations
Adults are able to work in any job, even ones I personally wouldn't work at
Information should be free
Calling this rationalist thoughts on the nonlinear saga but using broad statements about general norms is bad practice.
Gossip about infractions is good
The nonlinear saga overall reflects badly on rationalist norms
Organisations should follow national laws to the letter
Rationalists aren't a community/team with some kind of overarching norms/responsibilities
It is better to release an informative but selective piece than not
Rationalism has good enough whisper networks, considering the tradeoffs
Rationalists should ostracise orgs which behave in ways the majority of people dislike
It is the community's job to police organisations near rationalism
Orgs near the Rationalist Community should be obligated to uphold some common set of norms beyond those implied by local culture where they are located, and beyond epistemic norms closely connected with the Rationalist project.